WebPrivate equity group successfully defends allegations of misrepresentation, negligence, and breach of statutory duty Jones Day successfully defended a private equity group against a class action brought by over 80 investors in seven separate sets of proceedings. WebApr 30, 2024 · Where a transaction is effected in stages, with disposal of shares as a late stage, the shareholder will be treated as “connected” under s.249 during the earlier stages even if the purpose of the whole transaction was to sell the shares (Darty Holdings SAS v Carton-Kelly [2024] EWHC 1018 (Ch)).
Geoffrey Carton-Kelly as Liquidator of CGL Realisations Ltd ((in ... - vLex
WebJul 11, 2001 · Carton-Kelly v Darty Holdings SAS [2024] EWHC 2873 (Ch) (17 November 2024) Carton-Kelly v Darty Holdings SAS [2024] EWHC 3234 (Ch) (12 December 2024) … WebDarty Holdings SAS v Carton-Kelly [2024] EWHC 1018 (Ch) – an application to strike out a preference claim brought under s.239 Insolvency Act 1986, on the basis that the preferential payment post-dated the transaction which severed the connection between the parties. As a pupil, Elizabeth assisted Tiran Nersessian (led by Andreas Gledhill QC). green paint toys washing off jurassic
Darty Holdings SAS (as Successor to Kesa International Ltd) v
WebComet liquidator obtains £100m+ judgment on leading Insolvency Act preference claim Jones Day represents Geoff Carton-Kelly, liquidator of CGL Realisations Limited (formerly Comet Group Limited), in successfully obtaining a £100m+ judgment against Darty Holdings SAS by way of a preference claw back claim arising from the retail giant's ... WebDarty Holdings SAS, a subsidiary of the group, in its capacity as successor to Kesa International Limited (KIL), sold the British electrical retail chain Comet Group in 2012. The liquidator alleges that in February 2012, prior to the … WebSep 27, 2024 · In 2024, the liquidator of Comet (the “Liquidator”) brought proceedings seeking recovery from the recipient of that payment, Darty Holdings SAS (“Darty”), on the basis that the payment had been made as a ‘preference’ contrary to section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986. flynn o\u0027hara free shipping